Dictatorship and Democracy Essay Example for Free

Dictatorship and democracy EssayBenazir Bhutto was a renowned politician and the first female Prime Minister of Pakistan during a time that changed the deliver of the world the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks of the World Trade Center, Pentagon and Flight 95. She was outspoken against the policy, rhetoric and schedule of Al Qaeda. On the 4th of October 2002, Bhutto gave a speech to the world stating that Al Qaeda not only victimized western society, but victimized Muslim Nations and the people of Islam. In her speech she invites the Democracies of the world to help thwart terrorism by replacing Dictatorships with Democratic Governments that provide for their people. Bhutto claims, Democracies which operate on a lower floor pluralistic and public constraints, must provide for the public welfare, must provide social services, and must provide education, health and housing. Dictatorships need not. (WV 293) In this essay I will discuss my disposition of Benazir Bhuttos s tatement of government involvement of society. Benazir Bhutto belonged to a dissipate of the world that most of us do not know well. She comes from a part of the world that does not consider women as mans pair in society and religion.Part of this world has been plagued by the scourge of Al Qaeda a terrorist organization that based its belief in the total devastation of Western Civilization for the preservation of Islam, taught in the method of extremism. The Islamic extremist group Al Qaeda assassinated Benazir Bhutto for her disagreement of the ways, methods and uttermost(prenominal) fundamentalisms purported by Al Qaeda. She paid the ultimate price with her life for her outspoken beliefs against the unguided, against the recklessness and against the atrocity afflicted upon a Muslim society dictated by a take heed hell bent on suffer for not conforming to his/her blueprint.She herself was enlightened, seeking progress of mankind. Dictatorships are more prominent around the wor ld than one would think. approximately every nation has had a form of Dictatorship at one time in its history. Dictatorships are defined as authoritarian government rule by one person. Usu every(prenominal)y the leader of these societies will take resources from his/her people to distribute elsewhere, primarily the military. In turn the people will do without food, state run services, electricity, running water, education and medical services. Theyre even told how to worship religion by means ofout their lives.When people are ladened and subject to such regimes they every protest their government or in some cases embrace it. I understand what Bhutto is inferring with her quote. When people are forced into these oppressive regimes it breeds hatred that can tardily spill outside of its borders. It makes sense that oppressed people can become frustrated by outside influences and resort to a simplistic way of life. The oppressed can become more open to a suggested and dangerous do cket carrying with them the heavy burden over generations. On the other hand, Democracy is more in tune with its people.I define Democracy as a government system that sets all citizens as equal and allows its people to voice their opinion all for the greater good of society. In these societies the government can provide for its citizens what Dictatorships usually neglect. Democracies have the power to ensure that each citizen is entitled to education rights, social services, health care, public welfare and housing needs for the less fortunate. Democratic citizens who are in need should have no worries of doing without, as if Mom or protactinium is there to lend a helping hand to their children.The citizens can control what benefits they have rights to through Democratic process where as people subdued by a Dictator struggle to get by with whatever they can get their hands on. A Democracy supports the ideas of many whereas a Dictatorship pushes the agenda of one person across its pe ople. A Democracy encourages people to live positively and hopeful. Its easy to say that people who live under Democracy are not oppressed but in some cases spoiled by the fruits of their government.Unfortunately the circumstantial effect of Dictatorships can ultimately lead to factions that fatality zip fastener more but to change the world into their idealisms. These groups become extreme in their own right and force their agenda on the world through extreme action. Dictatorships become breeding grounds for this kind of filth and their ilk in some cases a terrorist organization houses a Dictator with the power to break rhetoric to the world by utilizing media outlets that air the aftermath of terror attacks. The entire populace of ones country is negatively reflected and become polarized by the extreme leadership.A Democracys citizens have everything they need to live a healthy life and make something of themselves and should have no reason to embrace green-eyed monster and ha tred of extremism. Ultimately the citizen makes the country. in that location are some very rare cases of factions that form within Democracies that hold a specific agenda. These factions really do nothing more than stir up the opinion of the public through their protest. Rarely do these factions become violent or organized enough to enforce their agenda onto the world through acts of terror. Do I agree with Benazir Bhutto? Yes and no.I honestly feel that all people of the world should live freely and allowed to undulate in society. I think that someone should be able to see a doctor if they are sick or with cancer. I do not believe that government should put itself before its people, at any given time I think that there should be no person that starves and lives under a bridge wondering what tomorrow is going to be like. And the one thing I think that Democracy cannot cure is extremism of any aspect of society. There will always be someone who is not happy with their way of life and will resort to an extreme ideals and methods.